Poultry science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#74 / 33,805
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
60
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 小时前

Poultry science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
索引数
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
简称 Poult Sci
缩写名称 poult sci
ISSN 1525-3171
宗旨与范围
URL
作者须知
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (56 total)

2019
Antioxidative effects of supplementing linseed oil-enriched diets with α-tocopherol, ascorbic acid, selenium, or their combination on carcass and meat quality in broilers.
Leskovec, J;Levart, A;Perić, L;Đukić Stojčić, M;Tomović, V;Pirman, T;Salobir, J;Rezar, V;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of in ovo injection of prebiotics and synbiotics on the productive performance and microstructural features of the superficial pectoral muscle in broiler chickens.
Dankowiakowska, A;Bogucka, J;Sobolewska, A;Tavaniello, S;Maiorano, G;Bednarczyk, M;
352 views DOI Abstract
2011
Effects of single and combined Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccinations on blood electrolytes and acid-base balance in commercial egg-laying hens.
Olanrewaju, H A;Collier, S D;Branton, S L;
Vol. 90 , No. 2 , pp. 358-63
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determination of aflatoxin biomarkers in excreta and ileal content of chickens.
Jurišić, N;Schwartz-Zimmermann, H E;Kunz-Vekiru, E;Moll, W D;Schweiger, W;Fowler, J;Berthiller, F;
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of unregulated chicken marketing practices on the frequency of Newcastle disease outbreaks in Kenya.
Ipara, B O;Otieno, D O;Nyikal, R A;Makokha, S N;
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
In ovo vaccination of broilers against Campylobacter jejuni using a bacterin and subunit vaccine.
Vandeputte, Jasmien;Martel, An;Van Rysselberghe, Nathalie;Antonissen, Gunther;Verlinden, Marc;De Zutter, Lieven;Heyndrickx, Marc;Haesebrouck, Freddy;Pasmans, Frank;Garmyn, An;
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Poultry in the classroom: effectiveness of an online poultry-science-based education program for high school STEM instruction.
Erickson, Mary G;Erasmus, Marisa A;Karcher, Darrin M;Knobloch, Neil A;Karcher, Elizabeth L;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protective Effect of Vitamin E on laying performance, antioxidant capacity, and immunity in laying hens challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis.
Liu, Y J;Zhao, L H;Mosenthin, R;Zhang, J Y;Ji, C;Ma, Q G;
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molybdenum and Cadmium co-induced the levels of autophagy-related genes via adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in Shaoxing Duck (Anas platyrhyncha) kidney.
Zhuang, Jionghan;Nie, Gaohui;Yang, Fan;Cao, Huabin;Xing, Chenghong;Dai, Xueyan;Hu, Guoliang;Zhang, Caiying;
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
The carcass traits, carcass nutrient composition, amino acid, fatty acid, and cholesterol contents of local Turkish goose varieties reared in an extensive production system.
Boz, Mehmet Akif;Oz, Fatih;Yamak, Umut Sami;Sarica, Musa;Cilavdaroglu, Elif;
Vol. 98 , No. 7 , pp. 3067-3080
293 views DOI Abstract
View All 56 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
60
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.