BMC public health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#23 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
45.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
85
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

BMC public health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name BMC Public Health
Abbreviated Name bmc public health
ISSN 1471-2458
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (353 total)

2006
Assessing effects of a media campaign on HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention in Nigeria: results from the VISION Project
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 123-
893 views Abstract
2005
Rapid assessment of injection practices in Cambodia, 2002
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 56-
847 views Abstract
2005
Are non-responders in a quitline evaluation more likely to be smokers?
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 52-
840 views Abstract
2012
On residents’ satisfaction with community health services after health care system reform in Shanghai, China, 2011
Vol. 12 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. S9-
836 views Abstract
2012
Troop education and avian influenza surveillance in military barracks in Ghana, 2011
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 957-
753 views Abstract
2018
Study on PM2.5 pollution and the mortality due to lung cancer in China based on geographic weighted regression model
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
752 views Abstract
2008
Obstacles to prompt and effective malaria treatment lead to low community-coverage in two rural districts of Tanzania
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 317-
740 views Abstract
2016
Dietary intake patterns of children aged 6 years and their association with socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, early feeding practices and body mass index
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
714 views Abstract
2019
Positive Health beyond boundaries in community care: design of a prospective study on the effects and implementation of an integrated community approach
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
654 views Abstract
46
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
70
33
85
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

45.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.