autonomous agents and multi-agent systems | Journament

Journal Ranking

#116 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 11 hours ago

autonomous agents and multi-agent systems

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Abbreviated Name autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
ISSN 1387-2532
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (54 total)

2015
irradiation and bone marrow reconstitution affect the functional ly49 natural killer cell repertoire in rats.
;Janne Merethe Nestvold;Bent eRolstad
Vol. 3 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2016
at least three transporters likely mediate threonine uptake needed for mouse embryonic stem cell proliferation
;Tara Marie Formisano;Lon J Van Winkle
Vol. 4 , pp. -
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
the tak1→ikkβ→tpl2→mkk1/mkk2 signaling cascade regulates il-33 expression in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells following infection by pseudomonas aeruginosa
;Raquel eFarias;Simon eRousseau
Vol. 3 , pp. -
277 views DOI Abstract
2015
exosomes as renal inductive signals in health and disease, and their application as diagnostic markers and therapeutic agents
;Mirja eKrause;Anatoliy eSamoylenko;Seppo J Vainio
Vol. 3 , pp. -
254 views DOI Abstract
2016
roles of fgf signals in heart development, health, and disease
;Nobuyuki Itoh;Hiroya Ohta;Yoshiaki Nakayama;Morichika Konishi
Vol. 4 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2014
therapeutic potential of matrix metalloproteinases in duchenne muscular dystrophy
;Yuji eOgura;Marjan eM Tajrishi;Shuichi eSato;Sajedah M Hindi;Ashok eKumar
Vol. 2 , pp. -
240 views DOI Abstract
2018
adhesive interactions delineate the topography of the immune synapse
;Noa Beatriz Martín-Cófreces;Noa Beatriz Martín-Cófreces;Miguel Vicente-Manzanares;Francisco Sánchez-Madrid;Francisco Sánchez-Madrid
Vol. 6 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2016
a lncrna perspective into (re)building the heart
;Stefan Frank;Aitor Aguirre;Laboratory for Developmental and Regenerative RNA Biology;Laboratory for Developmental and Regenerative RNA Biology;Laboratory for Developmental and Regenerative RNA Biology
Vol. 4 , pp. -
233 views DOI Abstract
2014
epigenetics and type ii diabetes mellitus: underlying mechanisms of prenatal predisposition
;J. David Sterns;John eSteele;Colin B. Smith;Kimberly L. Stevenson;G. Ian eGallicano
Vol. 2 , pp. -
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
the role of cardiac side population cells in cardiac regeneration
;Amritha Yellamilli;Amritha Yellamilli;Amritha Yellamilli;Jop H van Berlo;Jop H van Berlo;Jop H van Berlo;Jop H van Berlo
Vol. 4 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
View All 54 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.