american journal of clinical dermatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#164 / 33,865
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

american journal of clinical dermatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name am j clin dermatol
Abbreviated Name am j clin dermatol
ISSN 1179-1888
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (91 total)

2018
Vitamin D and the Skin: An Update for Dermatologists.
Kechichian, Elio;Ezzedine, Khaled;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 223-235
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology-Where We Are and the Way to the Future: A Review.
Hogarty, Daniel T;Su, John C;Phan, Kevin;Attia, Mohamed;Hossny, Mohammed;Nahavandi, Saeid;Lenane, Patricia;Moloney, Fergal J;Yazdabadi, Anousha;
261 views DOI Abstract
veränderungen der landwirtschaftlichen betriebs- und grundeigentumsstruktur als abbild des sozialökonomischen wandels im berggebiet : das beispiel grindelwald
;R. Nägeli-Oertle
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 3-13
253 views DOI Abstract
2012
engaging with feminist postcolonial concerns through participatory action research and intersectionality
;C. Schurr;D. Segebart
Vol. 67 , No. 3 , pp. 147-154
248 views DOI Abstract
sizilien : eine entwicklungsregion im spiegel ihrer wirtschaftsgeschichte
;C. Pfister
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 174-178
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
the influence of terracettes on the surface hydrology of steep-sloping and subalpine environments: some preliminary findings
;P. Greenwood;S. Kuonen;W. Fister;N. J. Kuhn
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. 63-73
237 views DOI Abstract
european urban polycentrism: a multiscale typology
;C. Rozenblat
Vol. 64 , No. 3 , pp. 175-185
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
Ökonomische und politische prinzipien im umbruch: die „quantitative revolution“ der geographie als spiegel bürgerlichen bewusstseins
;U. Eisel
Vol. 72 , No. 1 , pp. 55-64
229 views DOI Abstract
2015
cities in relations: trajectories of urban development in hanoi and ouagadougou
;S. D. Wolfe
Vol. 70 , No. 2 , pp. 165-166
218 views DOI Abstract
2016
making the drone strange: the politics, aesthetics and surrealism of levitation
;P. Adey
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 319-329
215 views DOI Abstract
View All 91 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.