The Journal of Biochemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#558 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
10.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
5
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
1
Diversity
2
Innovation
15
Community Impact
5
Ethics & Transparency
10
Content Quality
30
Editorial Diversity
2
Publication Regularity
1
Geographic Reach
5
Updated 3 months ago

The Journal of Biochemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name The Journal of Biochemistry
Abbreviated Name The Journal of Biochemistry
ISSN 1756-2651
Aim and Scope
The Journal of Biochemistry (J. Biochem.) publishes original articles, reviews, and rapid communications dealing with significant advances in biochemistry, molecular biology, and biotechnology. The Journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries, and gives priority to papers that are novel and of high scientific quality.
URL https://academic.oup.com/jb
Author Instructions https://academic.oup.com/jb/pages/General_Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Oct 26, 2025

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2012
Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor system: physiological functions in angiogenesis and pathological roles in various diseases
Masabumi Shibuya
DOI Abstract
2009
Bone morphogenetic protein receptors and signal transduction
Kohei Miyazono, Yuji Kamiya, Masato Morikawa
DOI Abstract
2006
Exosomes: A Common Pathway for a Specialized Function
Guillaume van Niel, Isabel Porto-Carreiro, Sabrina Simoes, Graça Raposo
DOI Abstract
1997
2APB, 2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl Borate, a Membrane-Penetrable Modulator of Ins(1,4,5)P3-Induced Ca2+ Release
Takayuki Maruyama, Toshiya Kanaji, Shinji Nakade, Tomio Kanno, Katsuhiko Mikoshiba
DOI Abstract
1996
Isolation and Characterization of GBP28, a Novel Gelatin-Binding Protein Purified from Human Plasma
Yasuko Nakano, Takashi Tobe, N.-H. Choi-Miura, Toshio Mazda, Masako Tomita
DOI Abstract
1984
Detection of Calcium Binding Proteins by 45Ca Autoradiography on Nitrocellulose Membrane after Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Gel Electrophoresis1
Kei Maruyama, Takashi Mikawa, Setsuro EBASHl
DOI Abstract
1980
Thermostability and Aliphatic Index of Globular Proteins
Atsushi Ikai
DOI Abstract
1966
Evidence for Biochemically Different Types of Vesicles in the Hepatic Microsomal Fraction*
Yoshio Imai, Akio Ito, Ryo Sato
DOI Abstract
1964
A Rapid Permethylation of Glycolipid, and Polysaccharide Catalyzed by Methylsulfinyl Carbanion in Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Senitiroh Hakomori
DOI Abstract
10
Overall
Poor
5
50
2
15
5
1
10
30
2
1
5
Journament

Overall Quality Score

10.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

5.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

2.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 1 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

1.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

10.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

30.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

2.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

1.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

5.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 1 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.