drugs of today (barcelona, spain : 1998) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#101 / 33,805
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

drugs of today (barcelona, spain : 1998)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name drugs today (barc)
Abbreviated Name drugs today
ISSN 1699-3993
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2016
increased ghrelin but low ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins in a rat model of methotrexate chemotherapy-induced anorexia
;Marie François;Kuniko Takagi;Romain Legrand;Nicolas Lucas;Stephanie Beutheu Youmba;Christine Bôle-Feysot;Aurore Cravezic;Naouel Tennoune;Jean-Claude do Rego;Moïse Coëffier;Akio Inui;Pierre Déchelotte;Sergueï O. Fetissov
Vol. 3 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
fish oil-derived long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduce expression of m1-associated macrophage markers in an ex vivo adipose tissue culture model, in part through adiponectin
;Anna A. De Boer;Jennifer M. Monk;Jennifer M. Monk;Danyelle M. Liddle;Krista A. Power;David W.L. Ma;Lindsay E. Robinson
Vol. 2 , pp. -
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Netarsudil/latanoprost fixed-dose combination for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Radell, J E;Serle, J B;
Vol. 55 , No. 9 , pp. 563-574
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) (November 4-6, 2019 - Copenhagen, Denmark).
Kibble, A;
Vol. 55 , No. 11 , pp. 713-718
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ertugliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Sharma, R;Razdan, K;Kuhad, A;Kuhad, A;
Vol. 55 , No. 3 , pp. 167-175
286 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of housing types on growth, feeding, physical activity and anxiety-like behavior in male sprague-dawley rats
;Jennifer Ann Teske;Jennifer Ann Teske;Jennifer Ann Teske;Jennifer Ann Teske;Claudio Esteban Perez Leighton;Claudio Esteban Perez Leighton;Emily eNoble;ChuanFeng eWang;ChuanFeng eWang;ChuanFeng eWang;Charles John Billington;Charles John Billington;Charles John Billington;Charles John Billington;Catherine M Kotz;Catherine M Kotz;Catherine M Kotz;Catherine M Kotz
Vol. 3 , pp. -
276 views DOI Abstract
2015
lactate and cancer: revisiting the warburg effect in an era of lactate shuttling
;Matthew Lawrence Goodwin;L. Bruce Gladden;Maarten WN Nijsten;Kevin B Jones
Vol. 1 , pp. -
273 views DOI
2018
kampo medicines for frailty in locomotor disease
;Hajime Nakae;Hajime Nakae;Yuko Hiroshima;Miwa Hebiguchi
Vol. 5 , pp. -
251 views DOI Abstract
2010
A report from the 106th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society (May 14-19, 2010 - New Orleans, Louisiana, USA).
Rabasseda, X;
Vol. 46 , No. 8 , pp. 609-29
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
carbohydrate-restriction with high-intensity interval training: an optimal combination for treating metabolic diseases?
;Monique E. Francois;Jenna B. Gillen;Jonathan P. Little
Vol. 4 , pp. -
229 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.