Medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#40 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

Medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Medicine (Baltimore)
Abbreviated Name medicine (baltimore)
ISSN 1536-5964
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (157 total)

2019
Thirteen kinds of Chinese medicine injections for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Vol. 98 , No. 26 , pp. e16200
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acute pulmonary thromboembolism caused by factor V Leiden mutation in South Korea: A case report.
Vol. 98 , No. 28 , pp. e16318
425 views DOI Abstract
1990
New and emerging etiologies for community-acquired pneumonia with implications for therapy. A prospective multicenter study of 359 cases
Vol. 69 , No. 5 , pp. -
424 views Abstract
2020
Magnetically guided targeted delivery of erythropoietin using magnetic nanoparticles: Proof of concept.
Vol. 99 , No. 19 , pp. e19972
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Retinal and choroidal abnormalities identified by multispectral imaging in patients with uveitis: Three case reports.
Vol. 98 , No. 20 , pp. e15655
405 views DOI Abstract
2018
Prognostic value role of radiofrequency lesion size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on outcomes of ablation in patients with ischemic scar-related ventricular tachycardia: A single center pilot study.
Vol. 97 , No. 46 , pp. e12955
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on psychological adjustment in Chinese pediatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A randomized trial.
Vol. 98 , No. 27 , pp. e16319
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictive risk stratification using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and initial troponin) and TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) scores in non-high risk chest pain patients: An African American urban community based hospital study.
Vol. 98 , No. 32 , pp. e16370
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of acupoint therapies on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A systematic review protocol.
Vol. 98 , No. 37 , pp. e17109
386 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
70
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.