journal of chemical and engineering data | Journament

Journal Ranking

#286 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

journal of chemical and engineering data

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name j chem eng data
Abbreviated Name journal of chemical and engineering data
ISSN 00219568
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2019
Erratum: New Series of green cyclic ammonium-based room temperature ionic liquids with alkylphosphite-containing anion: Synthesis and physicochemical characterization (Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data (2014) 59:4 (1193-1201) DOI: 10.1021/je4007053)
Zarrougui, R.
Vol. 64 , pp. 3670
292 views DOI
2010
Removal of rhodamine b from aqueous solution using palm shell-based activated carbon: Adsorption and kinetic studies
Mohammadi M.
Vol. 55 , pp. 5777-5785
287 views DOI
2019
Synthesis and Characterization of γ-CD-Modified TiO<inf>2</inf> Nanoparticles and Its Adsorption Performance for Different Types of Organic Dyes
Mousavi S.
Vol. 64 , pp. 135-149
278 views DOI
2019
Erratum: Al-Mg-Ca-layered double oxides for efficient removal of As(V) from water: The role of amides (Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data (2019) 64:4 (1594-1604) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.8b01154)
Kundu, S.
Vol. 64 , pp. 3668
257 views DOI
2010
Equilibrium and do - Do model fitting of water adsorption on four commercial activated carbons with different surface chemistry and pore structure
Li X.
Vol. 55 , pp. 5729-5732
242 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Density, Surface Tension, and Viscosity of Liquid Pb-Sb alloys (Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data (2018) 63:5 (1471-1479) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b01049)
Gancarz, T.
Vol. 64 , pp. 2911
234 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Hierarchical porous carbon nanospheres for efficient removal of toxic organic water contaminants of phenol and methylene blue (Journal of Chemical &amp; Engineering Data (2018) 63:3 (559-573) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00745)
Kundu, S.
Vol. 64 , pp. 3211
234 views DOI
2018
materialismo histórico e dialético em pesquisas do campo curricular: o ensino de história no curso de pedagogia
;Francisco Thiago Silva;Lívia Freitas Fonseca Borges
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 565-582
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to Thermodynamic modeling of aqueous electrolyte systems: Current status (Journal of Chemical &amp; Engineering Data (2017) 62:9 (2481-2495) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.6b01055)
May, P.
Vol. 64 , pp. 3212
224 views DOI
2010
Adsorption of dibenzothiophene on Ag/Cu/Fe-supported activated carbons prepared by ultrasonic-assisted impregnation
Xiao J.
Vol. 55 , pp. 5818-5823
224 views DOI
View All 41 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.