Frontiers in public health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#30 / 33,784
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

Frontiers in public health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Front Public Health
Abbreviated Name front public health
ISSN 2296-2565
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (100 total)

2015
Developing a free and easy to use digital goal setting tool for busy mums
Evans, Babs;
Vol. 4 , pp. -
587 views Abstract
2016
The challenges of co-developing a behaviour change app that aimed to make physical activity a habit
Forster, Alice S;Buykx, Penny;Martin, Neil;Southgate, Ben;Walker, Ian;
Vol. 4 , pp. -
542 views Abstract
2019
Design and Development of the "" Smartphone Game: A Blended Problem-Solving Intervention for Adolescent Mental Health in India.
Gonsalves, Pattie P;Hodgson, Eleanor S;Kumar, Avinash;Aurora, Tiara;Chandak, Yash;Sharma, Rhea;Michelson, Daniel;Patel, Vikram;
Vol. 7 , pp. 238
465 views DOI Abstract
2015
Digital Bangladesh: Using Formative Research to Develop Phone Messages for the Prevention and Control of Diabetes in Rural Bangladesh.
Jennings, Hannah Maria;Akter, Kohenour;
Vol. 4 , pp. -
459 views Abstract
2019
A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda.
Kwikiriza, Stuart;Stewart, Alex G;Mutahunga, Birungi;Dobson, Andrew E;Wilkinson, Ewan;
Vol. 7 , pp. 136
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bigger and Better? Representativeness of the Influenza A Surveillance Using One Consolidated Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Data Set as Compared to the Belgian Sentinel Network of Laboratories.
Van den Wijngaert, Sigi;Bossuyt, Nathalie;Ferns, Bridget;Busson, Laurent;Serrano, Gabriela;Wautier, Magali;Thomas, Isabelle;Byott, Matthew;Dupont, Yves;Nastouli, Eleni;Hallin, Marie;Kozlakidis, Zisis;Vandenberg, Olivier;
Vol. 7 , pp. 150
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bootstrap ARDL on Health Expenditure, CO2 Emissions, and GDP Growth Relationship for 18 OECD Countries.
Wang, Chien-Ming;Hsueh, Hsin-Pei;Li, Fangjhy;Wu, Cheng-Feng;
Vol. 7 , pp. 324
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why Work Overtime? A Systematic Review on the Evolutionary Trend and Influencing Factors of Work Hours in China.
Liu, Bei;Chen, Hong;Yang, Xingxing;Hou, Congmei;
Vol. 7 , pp. 343
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
berry leaves: an alternative source of bioactive natural products of nutritional and medicinal value
;Anastasia-Varvara Ferlemi;Fotini N. Lamari
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 17-
370 views DOI Abstract
2018
polymeric nanoparticles for increasing oral bioavailability of curcumin
;Anita Umerska;Caroline Gaucher;Felipe Oyarzun-Ampuero;Isabelle Fries-Raeth;Florence Colin;María Gabriela Villamizar-Sarmiento;Philippe Maincent;Anne Sapin-Minet
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 46-
360 views DOI Abstract
View All 100 Articles
45
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
70
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.