Journal of dairy science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#176 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
48
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

Journal of dairy science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Dairy Sci
Abbreviated Name j dairy sci
ISSN 1525-3198
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (140 total)

2018
Short-term methane emissions from 2 dairy farms in California estimated by different measurement techniques and US Environmental Protection Agency inventory methodology: A case study
Arndt C.
Vol. 101 , pp. 11461-11479
406 views DOI
2019
Invited review: Management strategies capable of improving the reproductive performance of heat-stressed dairy cattle.
Negrón-Pérez, V M;Fausnacht, D W;Rhoads, M L;
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protective effect of Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC04 on dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice is associated with modulation of the nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway.
Zhou, Xianrong;Liu, Huazhi;Zhang, Jing;Mu, Jianfei;Zalan, Zsolt;Hegyi, Ferenc;Takács, Krisztina;Zhao, Xin;Du, Muying;
Vol. 67 , pp. 400-410
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lactation performance of dairy cows fed rehydrated and ensiled corn grain differing in particle size and proportion in the diet.
Castro, Lucas P;Pereira, Marcos N;Dias, Julia D L;Lage, Douglas V D;Barbosa, Eugenio F;Melo, Ricardo P;Ferreira, Karla;Carvalho, Josué T R;Cardoso, Fabiana F;Pereira, Renata A N;
345 views DOI Abstract
2014
knowledge management: an analysis from the organizational development
;Rodrigo Valio Dominguez Gonzalez;Manoel Fernando Martins
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 131-147
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aflatoxin compromises development of the preimplantation bovine embryo through mechanisms independent of reactive oxygen production.
Jiang, Y;Hansen, P J;Xiao, Y;Amaral, T F;Vyas, D;Adesogan, A T;
339 views DOI Abstract
2013
nanometrology, standardization and regulation of nanomaterials in brazil: a proposal for an analytical-prospective model
;Ana Rusmerg Giménez Ledesma;Maria Fatima Ludovico Almeida
Vol. 8 , pp. 39-52
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
To change or not to change? Veterinarian and farmer perceptions of relational factors influencing the enactment of veterinary advice on dairy farms in the United Kingdom.
Bard, Alison M;Main, David;Roe, Emma;Haase, Anne;Whay, Helen Rebecca;Reyher, Kristen K;
Vol. 102 , pp. 10379-10394
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hepatic nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway and NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome is over-activated in ketotic dairy cows.
Shen, Taiyu;Li, Xinwei;Loor, Juan J;Zhu, Yiwei;Du, Xiliang;Wang, Xinghui;Xing, Dongmei;Shi, Zhen;Fang, Zhiyuan;Li, Xiaobing;Liu, Guowen;
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of mid-infrared-predicted milk and blood constituents with early-lactation disease, removal, and production outcomes in Holstein cows.
Bach, K D;Barbano, D M;McArt, J A A;
305 views DOI Abstract
View All 140 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
48
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

48.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.