annales pharmaceutiques francaises | Journament

Journal Ranking

#182 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
42
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

annales pharmaceutiques francaises

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name ann pharm fr
Abbreviated Name ann pharm fr
ISSN 0003-4509
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (77 total)

2019
Development of a new stability indicating method for the simultaneous separation of voriconazole from its impurities along with sodium benzoate used as a preservative in a powder for oral suspension.
Elleuch, A;Louati, K;Turki, M;Khalfallah, K;Safta, F;
342 views DOI Abstract
2013
endovascular therapy of acute tumour-related obstruction of the superior vena cava using a self-expanding nitinol stent
;Peter Kamusella;Christian Wissgott;Reimer Andresen
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 123-127
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Follow-up of glycemic index before and after Ramadan fasting in type 2 diabetes patients under antidiabetic medications
Abdessadek, M.
Vol. 77 , pp. 374-381
314 views DOI
2019
[Compliance of nursing professional practices related to drug preparation and administration: A cross-sectional and longitudinal descriptive study].
Holscher, É;Videau, M;Duval, S;Pelchat, V;Atkinson, S;Bussières, J-F;
Vol. 77 , No. 4 , pp. 313-323
287 views DOI Abstract
2016
computed tomography stroke findings and population demographics at pelonomi hospital, bloemfontein
;Kevin Daffue;Gina Joubert;Susan Otto
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules with technetium-99m mibi and ultrasonography
;Abubakar Farate;Aadil A. Gutta;Karien de Graaf;Trevor Mdaka
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
268 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Assessment of the use by hospital pharmacists of the opinions issued by the Haute Autorité de santé and the economic analysis tools proposed to them].
Moutier, H;Bocquet, F;Bourguignon, S;Paubel, P;
Vol. 77 , No. 2 , pp. 159-167
267 views DOI Abstract
2015
paediatric radiology from a psychosocial lens
;Tracy Sharbaugh;Karen van Zijl;Emily Beauchemin;Catherine Boland
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e3
264 views DOI Abstract
2020
Monolithic and core-shell particles stationary phase morphologies in protein analysis; peptide mapping of erythropoietin hormone and determination of carbetocin.
Ehab Ibrahim, A;Hashem, H;Elhenawee, M;Saleh, H;
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
disseminated kaposi sarcoma presenting in unusual locations: a case report
;Adziambei Mudau;Nonjabulo Z. Makhanya;Farhana E. Suleman
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e3
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 77 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
42
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

42.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.