BMC plant biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#48 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
44
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

BMC plant biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name BMC Plant Biol
Abbreviated Name bmc plant biol
ISSN 1471-2229
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 04, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (73 total)

2019
Mapping of a novel clubroot resistance QTL using ddRAD-seq in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.)
Laila, Rawnak;Park, Jong-In;Robin, Arif Hasan Khan;Natarajan, Sathishkumar;Vijayakumar, Harshavardhanan;Shirasawa, Kenta;Isobe, Sachiko;Kim, Hoy-Taek;Nou, Ill-Sup;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
490 views Abstract
2018
Genome-wide analysis and stress-responsive expression of CCCH zinc finger family genes in Brassica rapa.
Pi, Boyi;He, Xinghui;Ruan, Ying;Jang, Jyan-Chyun;Huang, Yong;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 373
475 views DOI Abstract
2013
Endophytic Penicillium funiculosum LHL06 secretes gibberellin that reprograms Glycine max L. growth during copper stress.
Khan, Abdul Latif;Lee, In-Jung;
Vol. 13 , pp. 86
438 views DOI Abstract
2017
Combined biotic stresses trigger similar transcriptomic responses but contrasting resistance against a chewing herbivore in Brassica nigra
Bonnet C.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
434 views DOI
2018
An APETALA1 ortholog affects plant architecture and seed yield component in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).
Shah, Smit;Karunarathna, Nirosha L;Jung, Christian;Emrani, Nazgol;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 380
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fossil evidence reveals how plants responded to cooling during the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition.
Cui, Yi-Ming;Wang, Wei;Ferguson, David K;Yang, Jian;Wang, Yu-Fei;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 402
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
A whole canopy gas exchange system for the targeted manipulation of grapevine source-sink relations using sub-ambient CO.
Smith, Jason P;Edwards, Everard J;Walker, Amanda R;Gouot, Julia C;Barril, Celia;Holzapfel, Bruno P;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 535
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Transcriptional regulation of Lonicera japonica Thunb. during flower development as revealed by comprehensive analysis of transcription factors.
Wang, Tantan;Yang, Bingxian;Guan, Qijie;Chen, Xi;Zhong, Zhuoheng;Huang, Wei;Zhu, Wei;Tian, Jingkui;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 198
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
CRISPR/Cas9 editing of three CRUCIFERIN C homoeologues alters the seed protein profile in Camelina sativa.
Lyzenga, Wendy J;Harrington, Myrtle;Bekkaoui, Diana;Wigness, Merek;Hegedus, Dwayne D;Rozwadowski, Kevin L;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 292
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
The WRKY transcription factor GhWRKY27 coordinates the senescence regulatory pathway in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).
Gu, Lijiao;Dou, Lingling;Guo, Yaning;Wang, Hantao;Li, Libei;Wang, Congcong;Ma, Liang;Wei, Hengling;Yu, Shuxun;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 116
371 views DOI Abstract
View All 73 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
44
15
30
70
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

44.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.