acta paediatrica scandinavica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#113 / 33,853
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 hours ago

acta paediatrica scandinavica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name acta paediatr scand
Abbreviated Name acta paediatr scand
ISSN 0001-656X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (65 total)

1966
Respiratory syncytial virus. An outbreak of acute respiratory illnesses in a home for infants
Sterner G;Wolontis S;Bloth B;de Hevesy G;;
Vol. 55 , No. 3 , pp. -
325 views Abstract
1977
Low concentration of plasma amino acids in newborn babies of diabetic mothers.
Vejtorp, M;Pedersen, J;Klebbe, J G;Lund, E;
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 53-8
293 views Abstract
2014
engineered polycaprolactone–magnesium hybrid biodegradable porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering
;Hoi Man Wong;Paul K. Chu;Frankie K.L. Leung;Kenneth M.C. Cheung;Keith D.K. Luk;Kelvin W.K. Yeung
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 561-567
274 views DOI Abstract
2016
tio2 nanosheets synthesized by atomic layer deposition for photocatalysis
;Riyanto Edy;Yuting Zhao;Gaoshan S. Huang;Jianjun J. Shi;Jing Zhang;Alexander A. Solovev;Yongfeng Mei
Vol. 26 , No. 5 , pp. 493-497
252 views DOI Abstract
1991
Comparison of serum and salivary antibodies in children vaccinated with oral live or parenteral inactivated poliovirus vaccines of different antigen concentrations.
Zaman, S;Carlsson, B;Jalil, F;Mellander, L;Van Wezel, A L;Böttiger, M;Hanson, L A;
Vol. 80 , No. 12 , pp. 1166-73
240 views Abstract
2014
forming of magnesium alloy microtubes in the fabrication of biodegradable stents
;Lixiao Wang;Gang Fang;Lingyun Qian;Sander Leeflang;Jurek Duszczyk;Jie Zhou
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 500-506
234 views DOI Abstract
2016
flexible supercapacitor electrodes with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes grown on aluminum foils
;Itir Bakis Dogru;Mete Batuhan Durukan;Onur Turel;Husnu Emrah Unalan
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 232-236
231 views DOI Abstract
2014
a β-type tinbzr alloy with low modulus and high strength for biomedical applications
;Qingkun Meng;Shun Guo;Qing Liu;Liang Hu;Xinqing Zhao
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 157-162
230 views DOI Abstract
1991
Second malignant neoplasms in patients treated for childhood leukemia. A population-based cohort study from the Nordic countries. The Nordic Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (NOPHO).
Nygaard, R;Garwicz, S;Haldorsen, T;Hertz, H;Jonmundsson, G K;Lanning, M;Moe, P J;
Vol. 80 , No. 12 , pp. 1220-8
222 views Abstract
2014
microstructures and mechanical properties of ti3al/ni-based superalloy joints arc welded with ti–nb and ti–ni–nb filler alloys
;Bingqing Chen;Huaping Xiong;Bingbing Sun;Siyi Tang;Borui Du;Neng Li
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 313-320
220 views DOI Abstract
View All 65 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.