Is Subcutaneous Route an Alternative to Intravenous Route for Mouse Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T?

Clicks: 338
ID: 9989
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 6 articles by views in concepts in magnetic resonance part a

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The present work compares intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes for contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in mice. For that purpose, we selected two contrast media used in clinical practice. MRI acquisitions were performed at 1.5 T on five adult mice (Swiss, 41 g
Reference Key
jeanphilippe2019isconcepts Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe;Goetz, Christian;Sayeh, Amira;Zorn, Pierre-Emmanuel;Kremer, Stéphane;Rémond, Yves;Constantinesco, André;Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle;Choquet, Philippe;Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe;Goetz, Christian;Sayeh, Amira;Zorn, Pierre-Emmanuel;Kremer, Stéphane;Rémond, Yves;Constantinesco, André;Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle;Choquet, Philippe;
Journal concepts in magnetic resonance part a
Year 2019
DOI
10.1155/2019/7428904
URL
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmra/2019/7428904/abs/
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.