Is Subcutaneous Route an Alternative to Intravenous Route for Mouse Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T?
Clicks: 284
ID: 9989
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
74.3
/100
281 views
228 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The present work compares intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes for contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in mice. For that purpose, we selected two contrast media used in clinical practice. MRI acquisitions were performed at 1.5 T on five adult mice (Swiss, 41 g
| Reference Key |
jeanphilippe2019isconcepts
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe;Goetz, Christian;Sayeh, Amira;Zorn, Pierre-Emmanuel;Kremer, Stéphane;Rémond, Yves;Constantinesco, André;Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle;Choquet, Philippe;Dillenseger, Jean-Philippe;Goetz, Christian;Sayeh, Amira;Zorn, Pierre-Emmanuel;Kremer, Stéphane;Rémond, Yves;Constantinesco, André;Aubertin-Kirch, Gaëlle;Choquet, Philippe; |
| Journal | concepts in magnetic resonance part a |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2019/7428904
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.