Stress Response of and Biofilms to Different Modified Atmospheres.

Clicks: 442
ID: 99881
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #15 of 201 articles by views in Frontiers in microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The sessile biofilms of and have increasingly become a critical threat in seafood safety. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of modified atmospheres on the formation ability of and biofilms. The stress responses of bacterial biofilm formation to modified atmospheres including anaerobiosis (20% carbon dioxide, 80% nitrogen), micro-aerobiosis (20% oxygen, 80% nitrogen), and aerobiosis (60% oxygen, 40% nitrogen) were illuminated by determining the live cells, chemical composition analysis, textural parameter changes, expression of regulatory genes, etc. Results showed that the biofilm formation ability of was efficiently decreased, supported by the fact that the modified atmospheres significantly reduced the key chemical composition [extracellular DNA (eDNA) and extracellular proteins] of the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and negatively altered the textural parameters (biovolume, thickness, and bio-roughness) of biofilms during the physiological conversion from anaerobiosis to aerobiosis, while the modified atmosphere treatment increased the key chemical composition of EPS and the textural parameters of biofilms from anaerobiosis to aerobiosis. Meanwhile, the expression of biofilm formation genes (, , , , and ), EPS production genes (, , and ), and virulence genes (, , , β, and β) of was downregulated. For the cells, the expression of biofilm formation genes (, , and ), EPS production genes (, , , ), and virulence genes (, , , β, and β) was upregulated during the physiological conversion. All these results indicated that the modified atmospheres possessed significantly different regulation on the biofilm formation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive , which will provide a novel insight to unlock the efficient control of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in modified-atmosphere packaged food.
Reference Key
qian2020stressfrontiers Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Qian, Hui;Li, Wei;Guo, Linxia;Tan, Ling;Liu, Haiquan;Wang, Jingjing;Pan, Yingjie;Zhao, Yong;
Journal Frontiers in microbiology
Year 2020
DOI
10.3389/fmicb.2020.00023
URL
Keywords
gene expression listeria monocytogenes stress response extracellular polymeric substance biofilms vibrio parahaemolyticus modified atmospheres

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.