[Neurologists and neuroscientists during the "Third Reich": attempt at an assessment].

Clicks: 251
ID: 98941
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
On behalf of the German Neurological Society (DGN) former presidents, honorary presidents and honorary members were checked for possible formal or ideological affiliations with National Socialism (NS) 75 years after the NS dictatorship. When the DGN was reformed in 1950, 6 of the 7 "founding fathers" were former members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), which is in strong contrast with the traditional narrative of a "new beginning". The first four (Pette, Schaltenbrand, Vogel and Döring) and in total 10 out of 13 incumbent presidents until 1976 (Zülch, Bay, Hirschmann, Jung, Bauer, Behrend) as well as honorary president Bodechtel had belonged to the NSDAP, Storm Troopers (SA), or "Schutzsstaffel" (SS). Approximately two thirds of the German and Austrian honorary members appointed until 1985 had been associated with the NS system or the NS ideology (e.g. Becker, Birkmayer, Jacob, Reichardt, Seitelberger, Tönnis and von Weizsäcker). The individual attitude of neuroscientists towards eugenics ranged from approval to refusal and a few had been involved with (Appellate) Hereditary Health Courts. None of the physicians considered here were directly involved in killing patients but several of them knew of the "concomitant research" in the context of "euthanasia". Others used research resources generated during the "euthanasia"-programme and after 1945. The only professor of neurology who conducted ethically inacceptable human experiments was Georg Schaltenbrand. Almost all neurologists could pursue their career after the war, sometimes after having undergone lengthy denazification trials but very few of them were willing to face up to their past. Categorizations, such as "collaborators", "beneficiaries" and "physicians with ambivalent roles" should be replaced by a more differentiated assessment. When dealing with the past of German neurology it would be advisable to resort to a categorization of remembrance instead of naming awards after incriminated persons.
Reference Key
karenberg2020neurologistsder Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Karenberg, Axel;Fangerau, Heiner;Martin, Michael;
Journal der nervenarzt
Year 2020
DOI
10.1007/s00115-019-00851-6
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.