What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention?

Clicks: 495
ID: 98197
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 15 articles by views in The American journal of sports medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Citation rate and journal impact factor have traditionally been used to assess research impact; however, these may fail to represent impact beyond the sphere of academics. Given that social media is now used to disseminate research, alternative web-based metrics (altmetrics) were recently developed to better understand research impact on social media. However, the relationship between altmetrics and traditional bibliometrics in orthopaedic literature is poorly understood.To (1) assess the extent that altmetrics correlate with traditional bibliometrics and (2) identify publication characteristics that predict greater altmetrics scores.Cross-sectional study.Articles published in (), , and between January 2016 and December 2016 were analyzed. Among the extracted publication characteristics were journal, number of authors, geographic region of origin, highest degree of first author, study subject and design, sample size, conflicts of interest, and level of evidence; number of references, institutions, citations, tweets, Facebook mentions, and news mentions; and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). Multivariate regressions were used to determine (1) publication characteristics predictive of AAS and social media attention (mentions on Twitter, Facebook, and the news) and (2) the relationship between AAS and citation rate.A total of 496 published articles were included, with a mean AAS of 8.6 (SD, 31.7; range, 0-501) and a mean citation rate of 15.0 (SD, 16.1; range, 0-178). Articles in (β = 19.9; < .001), publications from North America (β = 8.5; = .033), and studies concerning measure validation/reliability (β = 25.5; = .004) were independently associated with higher AAS. Greater AAS score significantly predicted a greater citation rate (β = 0.16; < .0001). The citation rate was an independent predictor of greater social media attention on Twitter, Facebook, and the news (odds ratio range, 1.02-1.03; < .05 all).AAS had a significant positive association with citation rates of articles in 5 high-impact orthopaedic journals. Articles in , studies concerning measure validation and reliability, and publications from North America were positively associated with greater AAS. A greater number of citations was consistently associated with publication attention received on social media platforms.
Reference Key
kunze2020whatthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kunze, Kyle N;Polce, Evan M;Vadhera, Amar;Williams, Brady T;Nwachukwu, Benedict U;Nho, Shane J;Chahla, Jorge;
Journal The American journal of sports medicine
Year 2020
DOI
10.1177/0363546520903703
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.