Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Promising Tool for Ballast Water Monitoring.
Clicks: 327
ID: 97555
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
327 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #42 of 112 articles by views in Environmental science & technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Nonindigenous species are introduced worldwide with ballast water (BW). To prevent further introductions, oceanic BW exchange and BW treatment systems are utilized, but their performance needs to be evaluated. To that aim, characterizing BW communities is essential but usually relies on exhaustive sampling and morphological taxonomic identification, which does not always allow fine-scale taxonomic resolution. Through the analysis of BW samples from 11 vessels arriving to the Chesapeake Bay (USA), we evaluated the potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for BW monitoring by assessing whether the impact of BW management type could be identified, analyzing the influence of BW sampling access locations on communities, and comparing the accuracy of eDNA for taxonomic assignment and identification of nonindigenous taxa. We found that (1) different sampling access locations of the same tank resulted in different communities, (2) communities from treated and exchanged BW differ, (3) signals of source port and of ocean exchange are observed, (4) eDNA metabarcoding results in more diversity than morphological taxonomy, and (5) the nonindigenous copepod , not reported before in the Chesapeake Bay, is detected. Overall, this study highlights the potential of eDNA metabarcoding for BW monitoring, but more comprehensive sampling will be needed to optimize the approach.
| Reference Key |
rey2019environmentalenvironmental
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rey, Anaïs;Carney, Katharine J;Quinones, Luz E;Pagenkopp Lohan, Katrina M;Ruiz, Gregory M;Basurko, Oihane C;Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara; |
| Journal | Environmental science & technology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1021/acs.est.9b01855
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.