Data and Lifelong Learning Protocol: Understanding Cultural Barriers and Facilitators to Using Clinical Performance Data to Support Continuing Professional Development.

Clicks: 345
ID: 97334
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 6 articles by views in the journal of continuing education in the health professions

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Continuing professional development (CPD) can support delivery of high-quality care, but may not be optimized until we can understand cultural barriers and facilitators, especially as innovations emerge. Lifelong learning (LLL), linked with quality improvement, competence, and professionalism, is a core competency in medical education. The purpose of this study is to examine cultural factors (individual, organizational, and systemic) that influence CPD and specifically the use of clinical data to inform LLL and CPD activities. This mixed-method study will examine the perceptions of two learner groups (psychiatrists and general surgeons) in three phases: (1) a survey to understand the relationship between data-informed learning and orientation to LLL; (2) semistructured interviews using purposive and maximum variation sampling techniques to identify individual-, organizational-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to engaging in data-informed LLL to support practice change; and (3) a document analysis of legislation, policies, and procedures related to the access and the use of clinical data for performance improvement in CPD. We obtained research ethics approval from the University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. By exploring two distinct learner groups, we will identify contextual features that may inform what educators should consider when conceptualizing and designing CPD activities and what initial actions need to be taken before CPD activities can be optimized. This study will lead to the development of a framework reflective of barriers and facilitators that can be implemented when planning to use data in CPD activities to support data adoption for LLL.
Reference Key
wiljer2018datathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Wiljer, David;Tavares, Walter;Mylopoulos, Maria;Campbell, Craig;Charow, Rebecca;Davis, Dave;Okrainec, Allan;Silver, Ivan;Sockalingam, Sanjeev;
Journal the journal of continuing education in the health professions
Year 2018
DOI
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000223
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.