A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma, Low-Level Laser Therapy, and Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema.

Clicks: 360
ID: 97060
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in lymphatic research and biology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous concentrated preparation of platelets characterized by lymphangiogenetic and tissue-repairing effects. Although PRP has been safely used in many different fields, there is no clinical study regarding the use of PRP in lymphedema treatment in humans. We assessed the clinical outcomes of PRP in patients with lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) in a randomized controlled trial. Patients with secondary LEL were randomly allocated to one of three groups consisting of treatment with PRP with complex decongestive physiotherapy (PRP+CDP group), low-level laser therapy with CDP (LLLT+CDP group), and only CDP (CDP group). Assessment of Lymphedema Quality of-Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) for health-related quality of life, lower-extremity-circumference (LEC) for edema, tissue dielectric constant (TDC) for extremity volume, 6-minute walking test (6MWT) for functional capacity, and numeric rating scale (NRS) scoring for extremity fullness were evaluated both before and after treatment. Forty-five patients (68.8% female) with mean age 40.84 ± 15.81 years were included in the study. Significant differences in LYMQOL, LEC, NRS, and TDC values both before and after treatment were found in all groups; however, there were no statistically significant difference in values between the three groups. In the PRP+CDP group, LYMQOL values had a larger effect size than the other two groups. Significant differences in 6MWT values both before and after treatment were found in PRP+CDP and LLLT+CDP groups; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the CDP group. This is the first clinical study to evaluate the usage of PRP in patients with secondary LEL. PRP might be an additional treatment option of lymphedema management; however, more clinical trials in humans are needed to yield more evidence in the usage of PRP in patients with lymphedema.
Reference Key
akgul2020alymphatic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Akgul, Ahmet;Tarakci, Ela;Arman, Nilay;Civi, Tugba;Irmak, Selin;
Journal lymphatic research and biology
Year 2020
DOI
10.1089/lrb.2019.0064
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.