Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Clicks: 114
ID: 96896
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #73 of 78 articles by views in plos medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. Its age-related characteristics have been studied in women in western countries, but whether these associations apply to women worldwide is not known. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We examined cross-sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal status in over 11,000 breast-cancer-free women aged 35-85 years, from 40 ethnicity- and location-specific population groups across 22 countries in the International Consortium on Mammographic Density (ICMD). MD was read centrally using a quantitative method (Cumulus) and its square-root metrics were analysed using meta-analysis of group-level estimates and linear regression models of pooled data, adjusted for body mass index, reproductive factors, mammogram view, image type, and reader. In all, 4,534 women were premenopausal, and 6,481 postmenopausal, at the time of mammography. A large age-adjusted difference in percent MD (PD) between post- and premenopausal women was apparent (-0.46 cm [95% CI: -0.53, -0.39]) and appeared greater in women with lower breast cancer risk profiles; variation across population groups due to heterogeneity (I2) was 16.5%. Among premenopausal women, the √PD difference per 10-year increase in age was -0.24 cm (95% CI: -0.34, -0.14; I2 = 30%), reflecting a compositional change (lower dense area and higher non-dense area, with no difference in breast area). In postmenopausal women, the corresponding difference in √PD (-0.38 cm [95% CI: -0.44, -0.33]; I2 = 30%) was additionally driven by increasing breast area. The study is limited by different mammography systems and its cross-sectional rather than longitudinal nature. CONCLUSIONS:Declines in MD with increasing age are present premenopausally, continue postmenopausally, and are most pronounced over the menopausal transition. These effects were highly consistent across diverse groups of women worldwide, suggesting that they result from an intrinsic biological, likely hormonal, mechanism common to women. If cumulative breast density is a key determinant of breast cancer risk, younger ages may be the more critical periods for lifestyle modifications aimed at breast density and breast cancer risk reduction.
Reference Key
burton2017mammographicplos Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Burton, Anya;Maskarinec, Gertraud;Perez-Gomez, Beatriz;Vachon, Celine;Miao, Hui;Lajous, Martín;López-Ridaura, Ruy;Rice, Megan;Pereira, Ana;Garmendia, Maria Luisa;Tamimi, Rulla M;Bertrand, Kimberly;Kwong, Ava;Ursin, Giske;Lee, Eunjung;Qureshi, Samera A;Ma, Huiyan;Vinnicombe, Sarah;Moss, Sue;Allen, Steve;Ndumia, Rose;Vinayak, Sudhir;Teo, Soo-Hwang;Mariapun, Shivaani;Fadzli, Farhana;Peplonska, Beata;Bukowska, Agnieszka;Nagata, Chisato;Stone, Jennifer;Hopper, John;Giles, Graham;Ozmen, Vahit;Aribal, Mustafa Erkin;Schüz, Joachim;Gils, Carla H Van;Wanders, Johanna O P;Sirous, Reza;Sirous, Mehri;Hipwell, John;Kim, Jisun;Lee, Jong Won;Dickens, Caroline;Hartman, Mikael;Chia, Kee-Seng;Scott, Christopher;Chiarelli, Anna M;Linton, Linda;Pollan, Marina;Flugelman, Anath Arzee;Salem, Dorria;Kamal, Rasha;Boyd, Norman;Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel;McCormack, Valerie;
Journal plos medicine
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.