Learning Retrosynthetic Planning through Simulated Experience.
Clicks: 335
ID: 96688
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
335 views
55 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #6 of 27 articles by views in acs central science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The problem of retrosynthetic planning can be framed as a one-player game, in which the chemist (or a computer program) works backward from a molecular target to simpler starting materials through a series of choices regarding which reactions to perform. This game is challenging as the combinatorial space of possible choices is astronomical, and the value of each choice remains uncertain until the synthesis plan is completed and its cost evaluated. Here, we address this search problem using deep reinforcement learning to identify policies that make (near) optimal reaction choices during each step of retrosynthetic planning according to a user-defined cost metric. Using a simulated experience, we train a neural network to estimate the expected synthesis cost or value of any given molecule based on a representation of its molecular structure. We show that learned policies based on this value network can outperform a heuristic approach that favors symmetric disconnections when synthesizing unfamiliar molecules from available starting materials using the fewest number of reactions. We discuss how the learned policies described here can be incorporated into existing synthesis planning tools and how they can be adapted to changes in the synthesis cost objective or material availability.
| Reference Key |
schreck2019learningacs
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Schreck, John S;Coley, Connor W;Bishop, Kyle J M; |
| Journal | acs central science |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1021/acscentsci.9b00055
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.