Evaluation of methods for volumetric analysis of pediatric brain data: The childmetrix pipeline versus adult-based approaches
Clicks: 245
ID: 96609
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
245 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #8 of 8 articles by views in neuroimage: clinical
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Pediatric brain volumetric analysis based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is of particular interest in order to understand the typical brain development and to characterize neurodevelopmental disorders at an early age. However, it has been shown that the results can be biased due to head motion, inherent to pediatric data, and due to the use of methods based on adult brain data that are not able to accurately model the anatomical disparity of pediatric brains. To overcome these issues, we proposed childmetrix, a tool developed for the analysis of pediatric neuroimaging data that uses an age-specific atlas and a probabilistic model-based approach in order to segment the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). The tool was extensively validated on 55 scans of children between 5 and 6 years old (including 13 children with developmental dyslexia) and 10 pairs of test-retest scans of children between 6 and 8 years old and compared with two state-of-the-art methods using an adult atlas, namely icobrain (applying a probabilistic model-based segmentation) and Freesurfer (applying a surface model-based segmentation). The results obtained with childmetrix showed a better reproducibility of GM and WM segmentations and a better robustness to head motion in the estimation of GM volume compared to Freesurfer. Evaluated on two subjects, childmetrix showed good accuracy with 82–84% overlap with manual segmentation for both GM and WM, thereby outperforming the adult-based methods (icobrain and Freesurfer), especially for the subject with poor quality data. We also demonstrated that the adult-based methods needed double the number of subjects to detect significant morphological differences between dyslexics and typical readers. Once further developed and validated, we believe that childmetrix would provide appropriate and reliable measures for the examination of children's brain. Keywords: Brain volumetric analysis, Neuroimaging data, Pediatric atlas, Child-adjusted processing, Magnetic resonance imaging
| Reference Key |
phan2018evaluationneuroimage
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Phan, Thanh Vân;Sima, Diana M.;Beelen, Caroline;Vanderauwera, Jolijn;Smeets, Dirk;Vandermosten, Maaike; |
| Journal | neuroimage: clinical |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.