Outcomes of unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Two decades of experience.
Clicks: 353
ID: 96457
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
353 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 7 articles by views in laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
(a) Determine the demographic and medical risk factors for patients who presented with unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL); (b) identify treatments that patients underwent; (c) evaluate the adequacy of follow-up and compliance with long-term hearing rehabilitation.Retrospective review of patients who presented with unilateral ISSNHL between January 1998 and December 2017 at a tertiary care academic medical center.Two hundred-four patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 129 (63.2%) did not undergo treatment at an outside hospital prior to our evaluation. In this subgroup, the average pretreatment pure tone average (PTA) was 61.9 ± 2.5 dB (dB). The most common treatment was oral steroids and was recommended in 76 patients (59.9%). Patients also underwent intratympanic (IT) steroid injections (7.2%) or oral steroids followed by salvage IT injections (19.4%). Mean follow-up duration was 17.9 (±29.2) months, and posttreatment PTA (45.6 ± 2.6 dB) was significantly better than baseline ( < .001). In this cohort, hearing amplification was infrequently recommended. Less than 20% of patients reported active hearing amplification use at their most recent visit. At follow-up, 90 patients (69.8%) reported subjective improvement in hearing after treatment. Only 55 patients (42.6%) showed improvement in PTA compared to their pretreatment audiograms.Many patients with ISSNHL experienced audiometric improvement after treatments, but most had persistent hearing loss. The duration of follow-up was short. Most patients did not use long-term hearing amplification. Future studies are needed to identify factors that contribute to reduced follow-up and low compliance with hearing amplification use in ISSNHL.2c.
| Reference Key |
xie2019outcomeslaryngoscope
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Xie, Yanjun;Orabi, Norman A;Zwolan, Terry A;Basura, Gregory J; |
| Journal | laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/lio2.331
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.