Comparison of Methods Used in Calculated of Cooling Loads: The Case of Elementary School

Clicks: 256
ID: 96220
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in uludağ university journal of the faculty of engineering

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Nowadays, in terms of continuity of indoor environment comfort conditions and decreased initial investment, maintenance and operating costs, selected of a appropriate cooling system is important in buildings. In the selection of cooling system, system capacity need to determine according to building cooling load. That cooling load is not calculated in the reliability way cause selected cooling system that is not suitable to building, increase cooling system cost and aggravation indoor environment comfort conditions. Therefore, the reliability calculation method should be used in the calculation of building cooling loads. There are several methods that calculates building cooling loads. In this study, TEDT/TA, HB, TFM, CLTD/SCL/CLF and RTS methods that are used commonly from this methods are compared according to their using data, coefficients and calculation procedure. The elementary school that is located in İstanbul is selected to compared of numerical differences among these methods and cooling loads of this building for July 21 that is design day are determined according to calculation templates prepared in MS Excel using TEDT/TA, TFM, CLTD/SCL/CLF and RTS methods. Obtained results are found difference between 5% and 25% according to building occupancy period.

Reference Key
kalfa2015comparisonuludag Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors KALFA, Sibel MAÇKA;YAŞAR, Yalçın;
Journal uludağ university journal of the faculty of engineering
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.