Comparison of Methods Used in Calculated of Cooling Loads: The Case of Elementary School
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in uludağ university journal of the faculty of engineering
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
Nowadays, in terms of continuity of indoor environment comfort conditions and decreased initial investment, maintenance and operating costs, selected of a appropriate cooling system is important in buildings. In the selection of cooling system, system capacity need to determine according to building cooling load. That cooling load is not calculated in the reliability way cause selected cooling system that is not suitable to building, increase cooling system cost and aggravation indoor environment comfort conditions. Therefore, the reliability calculation method should be used in the calculation of building cooling loads. There are several methods that calculates building cooling loads. In this study, TEDT/TA, HB, TFM, CLTD/SCL/CLF and RTS methods that are used commonly from this methods are compared according to their using data, coefficients and calculation procedure. The elementary school that is located in İstanbul is selected to compared of numerical differences among these methods and cooling loads of this building for July 21 that is design day are determined according to calculation templates prepared in MS Excel using TEDT/TA, TFM, CLTD/SCL/CLF and RTS methods. Obtained results are found difference between 5% and 25% according to building occupancy period.
| Reference Key |
kalfa2015comparisonuludag
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | uludağ university journal of the faculty of engineering |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.