Process of Judging Significant Modifications for Different Transportation Systems compared to the Approach for Nuclear Installations

Процесс оценки существенных модификаций для различных транспортных систем в сравнении с подходом к ядерным установкам

Clicks: 407
ID: 95851
2015
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #7 of 10 articles by views in transnav: international journal on marine navigation and safety of sea transportation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The implementation of the CSM regulation by the European Commission in 2009 which harmonizes the risk assessment process and introduces a rather new concept of judging changes within the European railway industry. This circumstance has risen the question how other technology sectors handle the aspect of modifications and alterations. The paper discusses the approaches for judging the significance of modifications within the three transport sectors of European railways, aviation and maritime transportation and the procedure which is used in the area of nuclear safety. We will outline the similarities and differences between these four methods and discuss the underlying reasons. Finally, we will take into account the role of the European legislator and the fundamental idea of a harmonization of the different approaches.
Внедрение Европейской комиссией в 2009 году регламента CSM гармонизировало процесс оценки рисков и ввело новую концепцию оценки изменений в европейской железнодорожной отрасли. Это обстоятельство вызвало вопрос о том, как в других технологических отраслях решаются вопросы внесения модификаций и изменений. В данной статье рассматриваются подходы к оценке значимости модификаций в трех транспортных секторах — европейском железнодорожном, авиационном и морском транспорте, а также процедура, применяемая в сфере ядерной безопасности. Обозначены сходства и различия между этими четырьмя методами и проанализированы лежащие в их основе причины. Наконец, рассмотрена роль европейского законодателя и основополагающая идея гармонизации различных подходов.
Reference Key
petrek2015processtransnav Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nicolas Petrek, Heinz Peter Berg
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal transnav: international journal on marine navigation and safety of sea transportation
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.transnav.eu/files/Process of Judging Significant Modifications for Different Transportation Systems compared to the Approach for Nuclear Installations,610.pdf
Keywords
Technology economics as a science transportation and communications naval architecture. shipbuilding. marine engineering canals and inland navigation. waterways

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.