Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania.
Clicks: 275
ID: 95828
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
72.6
/100
260 views
212 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Environmental challenges persist across the world, including the Australasian region of Oceania, where biodiversity hotspots and unique ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef are common. These systems are routinely affected by multiple stressors from anthropogenic activities, and increasingly influenced by global megatrends (e.g., the food-energy-water nexus, demographic transitions to cities) and climate change. Here we report priority research questions from the Global Horizon Scanning Project, which aimed to identify, prioritize, and advance environmental quality research needs from an Australasian perspective, within a global context. We employed a transparent and inclusive process of soliciting key questions from Australasian members of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Following submission of 78 questions, 20 priority research questions were identified during an expert workshop in Nelson, New Zealand. These research questions covered a range of issues of global relevance, including research needed to more closely integrate ecotoxicology and ecology for the protection of ecosystems, increase flexibility for prioritizing chemical substances currently in commerce, understand the impacts of complex mixtures and multiple stressors, and define environmental quality and ecosystem integrity of temporary waters. Some questions have specific relevance to Australasia, particularly the uncertainties associated with using toxicity data from exotic species to protect unique indigenous species. Several related priority questions deal with the theme of how widely international ecotoxicological data and databases can be applied to regional ecosystems. Other timely questions, which focus on improving predictive chemistry and toxicology tools and techniques, will be important to answer several of the priority questions identified here. Another important question raised was how to protect local cultural and social values and maintain indigenous engagement during problem formulation and identification of ecosystem protection goals. Addressing these questions will be challenging, but doing so promises to advance environmental sustainability in Oceania and globally.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (294 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
gaw2019towardsintegrated
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gaw, Sally;Harford, Andrew;Pettigrove, Vincent;Sevicke-Jones, Graham;Manning, Therese;Ataria, James;Cresswell, Tom;Dafforn, Katherine A;Leusch, Frederic Dl;Moggridge, Bradley;Cameron, Marcus;Chapman, John;Coates, Gary;Colville, Anne;Death, Claire;Hageman, Kimberly;Hassell, Kathryn;Hoak, Molly;Gadd, Jennifer;Jolley, Dianne F;Karami, Ali;Kotzakoulakis, Konstantinos;Lim, Richard;McRae, Nicole;Metzeling, Leon;Mooney, Thomas;Myers, Jackie;Pearson, Andrew;Saaristo, Minna;Sharley, Dave;Stuthe, Julia;Sutherland, Oliver;Thomas, Oliver;Tremblay, Louis;Wood, Waitangi;Boxall, Alistair Ba;Rudd, Murray A;Brooks, Bryan W; |
| Journal | integrated environmental assessment and management |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/ieam.4180
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.