Outcomes of curative (chemo)radiotherapy for patients with non-p16 positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who are borderline for curative treatment.
Clicks: 399
ID: 93419
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
66.3
/100
399 views
282 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 5 articles by views in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Appropriate selection of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients for curative treatment is difficult, and it is a very understudied issue. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of curative intent treatment in non-p16 positive HNSCC patients assessed as having borderline curability.A single institution retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of non-p16 positive HNSCC patients with borderline curability. Predefined criteria for borderline curability were as follows: (i) T4 and/or N3 disease; or (ii) ECOG status ≥2; or (iii) age ≥75 years.A total of 114 patients were identified. A total of 56 had N3/T4, 32 were >ECOG 2 and 57 were >75 years. A total of 29 had two or more borderline curability criteria. Progression-free survival rate (PFS) at 1 and 2 years was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 63-79) and 53% (95% CI, 43-62), respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years was 76% (95% CI, 67-83) and 61% (95% CI, 51-69), respectively. On multivariable analysis, the only independent prognostic factor for OS was the adult comorbidity evaluation-27 (ACE-27) grade (HR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = 0.018).Patients with borderline curability criteria treated with curative intent achieved good PFS and OS. ACE-27 was an important prognostic factor in this population.
| Reference Key |
xing2020outcomesjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Xing, Daniel;Tiong, Albert;Bressel, Mathias;Rischin, Danny;Tran, Phillip;Corry, June; |
| Journal | Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1111/1754-9485.12995
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.