Comparative investigation on thermal decomposition of powdered and pelletized biomasses: Thermal conversion characteristics and apparent kinetics.

Clicks: 354
ID: 93341
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #35 of 274 articles by views in Bioresource technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 274 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this work, the thermal degradation behaviors of two kinds of biomasses (pinewood and rice husk) with powder and pellet under three oxygen concentrations were investigated by a self-designed macro-thermogravimetric analyzer. An obvious hysteresis of thermal degradation of biomass pellets was observed under three conditions. The maximum activation energy of biomass pellets was significantly greater than that of biomass powders, while their average activation energies were almost equal based on distributed activation energy model. For the oxygen-rich combustion, the comprehensive combustion character index of powdered and pelletized biomasses ranged from 3.92 × 10 to 5.16 × 10%·min·°C and from 1.82 × 10 to 1.91 × 10%·min·°C, respectively. Furthermore, the derived biochar of powdered biomass has a higher caloricity than that of pelletized biomass during combustion by TG-DSC analysis. The performances of thermal degradation observed by macro-thermogravimetric analyzer could factually reveal the influence of mass and heat transfer on the thermochemical conversion of powdered and pelletized biomasses.
Reference Key
guo2020comparativebioresource Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Guo, Gaofei;Zhang, Ke;Liu, Chaoxian;Xie, Shenglin;Li, Xu;Li, Bin;Shu, Junsheng;Niu, Yong;Zhu, Hongfu;Ding, Meizhou;Zhu, Wenkui;
Journal Bioresource technology
Year 2020
DOI
S0960-8524(20)30001-8
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.