Analyzing data and data sources towards a unified approach for ensuring end-to-end data and data sources quality in healthcare 4.0.
Clicks: 350
ID: 92440
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.0
/100
350 views
238 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #15 of 70 articles by views in computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Healthcare 4.0 is being hailed as the current industrial revolution in the healthcare domain, dealing with billions of heterogeneous IoT data sources that are connected over the Internet and aim at providing real-time health-related information for citizens and patients. It is of major importance to utilize an automated way to identify the quality levels of these data sources, in order to obtain reliable health data.In this manuscript, we demonstrate an innovative mechanism for assessing the quality of various datasets in correlation with the quality of the corresponding data sources. For that purpose, the mechanism follows a 5-stepped approach through which the available data sources are detected, identified and connected to health platforms, where finally their data is gathered. Once the data is obtained, the mechanism cleans it and correlates it with the quality measurements that are captured from each different data source, in order to finally decide whether these data sources are being characterized as qualitative or not, and thus their data is kept for further analysis.The proposed mechanism is evaluated through an experiment using a sample of 18 existing heterogeneous medical data sources. Based on the captured results, we were able to identify a data source of unknown type, recognizing that it was a body weight scale. Afterwards, we were able to find out that the API method that was responsible for gathering data out of this data source was the getMeasurements() method, while combining both the body weight scale's quality and its derived data quality, we could decide that this data source was considered as qualitative enough.By taking full advantage of capturing the quality of a data source through measuring and correlating both the data source's quality itself and the quality of its derived data, the proposed mechanism provides efficient results, being able to ensure end-to-end both data sources and data quality.
| Reference Key |
mavrogiorgou2019analyzingcomputer
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mavrogiorgou, Argyro;Kiourtis, Athanasios;Perakis, Konstantinos;Miltiadou, Dimitrios;Pitsios, Stamatios;Kyriazis, Dimosthenis; |
| Journal | computer methods and programs in biomedicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0169-2607(18)30622-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.