Constructing and influencing perceived authenticity in science communication: Experimenting with narrative.

Clicks: 305
ID: 92309
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #836 of 2,056 articles by views in PloS one

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,056 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study develops a measure of perceived authenticity in science communication and then explores communication strategies to improve the perceived authenticity of a scientific message. The findings are consistent with literature around trust and credibility, but indicate that authenticity-the perception that the scientist is a unique individual with qualities beyond institutional affiliations or a role in the production of the research-may add a potentially important dimension to accepted categories of integrity and benevolence.
Reference Key
saffran2020constructingplos Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Saffran, Lise;Hu, Sisi;Hinnant, Amanda;Scherer, Laura D;Nagel, Susan C;
Journal PloS one
Year 2020
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0226711
URL
Keywords
clinical trials communication recruitment consent recall research registry

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.