The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse.

Clicks: 186
ID: 91849
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
We report two EEG/ERP experiments that examined processing of repeated name (e.g., Bill; Experiment 1) and pronoun (e.g., he; Experiment 2) subject anaphors to single antecedents (e.g., Bill) and to antecedents embedded in a conjunction (e.g., Bill and Mary) within sentences and discourses. Experiment 1 replicated previous reports of repeated references to single antecedents eliciting greater N400 negativity than repeated references to conjoined antecedents within sentences, and extended these results to cross-sentence (discourse) references. Experiment 2 found that pronouns also elicited greater N400 negativity following single than conjoined antecedents. In both experiments, references to conjoined antecedents elicited greater frontal negativity than references to single antecedents in both sentences and discourse. Our results indicate that, in processing subject anaphors, the N400 is an index of reference predictability rather than a marker of the fit between antecedent salience and reference form, and that frontal negativity marks referential ambiguity elicited by conjoined phrases.
Reference Key
almor2017thebrain Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Almor, Amit;Nair, Veena A;Boiteau, Timothy W;Vendemia, Jennifer M C;
Journal brain and language
Year 2017
DOI
S0093-934X(16)30060-8
URL
Keywords
reference n400 discourse sentence anaphor lan repeated name penalty

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.