Brief Report: "Um" Fillers Distinguish Children With and Without ASD.

Clicks: 303
ID: 91841
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #23 of 54 articles by views in journal of autism and developmental disorders

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Two laboratories have reported that children with ASD are less likely than their typical peers to fill pauses with um but their use of uh is unaffected (Irvine et al., J Autism Dev Disord 46(3):1061-1070, 2016; Gorman et al., Autism Res 9(8):854-865, 2016). In this brief report, we replicated this finding by comparing the discourse of 7-to-15-year-olds with ASD (N = 31) to that of their typically developing same-age peers (N = 32). The robustness of this easily documented difference in discourse suggests a potentially useful clinical marker of ASD.
Reference Key
mcgregor2018briefjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors McGregor, Karla K;Hadden, Rex R;
Journal journal of autism and developmental disorders
Year 2018
DOI
10.1007/s10803-018-3736-1
URL
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder discourse disfluency fillers

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.