Development of an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) atrial fibrillation working group.

Clicks: 422
ID: 91419
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #7 of 336 articles by views in european heart journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 336 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
As health systems around the world increasingly look to measure and improve the value of care that they provide to patients, being able to measure the outcomes that matter most to patients is vital. To support the shift towards value-based health care in atrial fibrillation (AF), the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled an international Working Group (WG) of 30 volunteers, including health professionals and patient representatives to develop a standardized minimum set of outcomes for benchmarking care delivery in clinical settings.Using an online-modified Delphi process, outcomes important to patients and health professionals were selected and categorized into (i) long-term consequences of disease outcomes, (ii) complications of treatment outcomes, and (iii) patient-reported outcomes. The WG identified demographic and clinical variables for use as case-mix risk adjusters. These included baseline demographics, comorbidities, cognitive function, date of diagnosis, disease duration, medications prescribed and AF procedures, as well as smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, and physical activity. Where appropriate, and for ease of implementation, standardization of outcomes and case-mix variables was achieved using ICD codes. The standard set underwent an open review process in which over 80% of patients surveyed agreed with the outcomes captured by the standard set.Implementation of these consensus recommendations could help institutions to monitor, compare and improve the quality and delivery of chronic AF care. Their consistent definition and collection, using ICD codes where applicable, could also broaden the implementation of more patient-centric clinical outcomes research in AF.
Reference Key
seligman2020developmenteuropean Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Seligman, William H;Das-Gupta, Zofia;Jobi-Odeneye, Adedayo O;Arbelo, Elena;Banerjee, Amitava;Bollmann, Andreas;Caffrey-Armstrong, Bridget;Cehic, Daniel A;Corbalan, Ramon;Collins, Michael;Dandamudi, Gopi;Dorairaj, Prabhakaran;Fay, Matthew;Van Gelder, Isabelle C;Goto, Shinya;Granger, Christopher B;Gyorgy, Bathory;Healey, Jeff S;Hendriks, Jeroen M;Hills, Mellanie True;Hobbs, F D Richard;Huisman, Menno V;Koplan, Kate E;Lane, Deirdre A;Lewis, William R;Lobban, Trudie;Steinberg, Benjamin A;McLeod, Christopher J;Moseley, Spencer;Timmis, Adam;Yutao, Guo;Camm, A John;
Journal european heart journal
Year 2020
DOI
ehz871
URL
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation outcomes value-based health care patient-reported

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.