Whole genome sequencing in drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in routine practice in Lyon, France.
Clicks: 293
ID: 91127
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
293 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #16 of 23 articles by views in international journal of antimicrobial agents
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Rapid and correct determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) drug-susceptibility is a challenge for tuberculosis management. Phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) remains the reference method but is time consuming. Herein, we compared the genotypic prediction of the first-line drug susceptibility profile obtained by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to that obtained by phenotypic DST and by line-probe assay (LPA).All MTB strains isolated from patients during routine practice at the mycobacteria laboratory of the Lyon University Hospital, France, between November 2016 and July 2019 were included (n=274). These were tested for the first-line drugs using phenotypic DST (mycobacteria-growth-indicator-tube assay), and for genotypic prediction of the susceptibility profile with LPA and WGS.Considering phenotypic DST as reference, WGS predicted resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide with sensitivities of 100%, 100%, 100% and 93.8%, respectively, and susceptibility to these drugs with specificities of 99.6%, 100%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. The performance of LPA was poorer; sensitivity was 83.3% for rifampicin and 85.7% for isoniazid susceptibility. Five isolates were classified as susceptible according to phenotypic DST (1 for rifampicin, 4 for ethambutol), while WGS detected resistance mutations in rpoB and embB genes.WGS, used under appropriate conditions of quality control, has good performance to predict the resistance profile for the 4 first-line drugs, and corrects the phenotypic DST. This study highlights the need for future guidelines recommending WGS as the initial tool in routine practice in areas where the prevalence of TB and drug-resistant MTB are low.
| Reference Key |
genestet2020wholeinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Genestet, Charlotte;Hodille, Elisabeth;Berland, Jean-Luc;Ginevra, Christophe;Bryant, Juliet E;Ader, Florence;Lina, Gérard;Dumitrescu, Oana;, ; |
| Journal | international journal of antimicrobial agents |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S0924-8579(20)30051-0
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.