EUCAST evaluation of 21 brands of Mueller-Hinton dehydrated media for disk diffusion testing.

Clicks: 374
ID: 91037
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 22 articles by views in clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the european society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar is recommended by EUCAST and CLSI for disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Using EUCAST methodology, we evaluated the performance of 21 internationally available brands of dehydrated MH agar from 17 manufacturers.MH plates were prepared in-house and evaluated against four quality control (QC) strains tested in triplicate, using EUCAST disk diffusion methodology. This resulted in 30 disk-QC strain combinations and 90 readings per MH brand. All brands were tested blindly and in parallel. Results were evaluated against targets and ranges in the EUCAST QC tables. The agar depth, pH and concentration of five cations were measured for all brands.Six brands of MH agar (Bio-Rad, Biolife, Oxoid, Sigma MH 2, BD BBL MH II and CRITERION) demonstrated excellent performance, with ≥99% of zone diameter readings within QC ranges and ≥70% on target ±1 mm. The poorest performance was seen for Biolab and Merck MH, with 10% (9/90) and 23% (21/90) of readings outside the QC ranges, respectively. Of all readings, 4.9% (93/1890) were out-of-range, mainly related to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n=25), aminoglycosides (n=25) and fluoroquinolones (n=15). The cation content differed considerably between the agars and for four brands, pH were outside the acceptable range 7.2-7.4.This study evaluated the performance and content of 21 brands of MH dehydrated media. Six brands showed excellent performance with all investigated antimicrobial classes. Others exhibited problems with one or more classes of agents. This could partly be explained by differences in concentration of specific chemical components and pH.
Reference Key
hman2020eucastclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Åhman, Jenny;Matuschek, Erika;Kahlmeter, Gunnar;
Journal clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the european society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases
Year 2020
DOI
S1198-743X(20)30043-4
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.