Regulatory Issues of Voluntary Certification of Food Supplements in Russia.
Clicks: 302
ID: 90458
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
302 views
63 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 15 articles by views in therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
When registering food supplements in Russia, restrictions on the labeling and consumer leaflet contents are tightly controlled by the regulatory agencies. Thus, misleading advertising is the most difficult problem with the turnover of these products if information in the commercials does not correspond to the information on indications for use that were agreed upon during state registration (or sanitary and epidemiologic control). An established procedure of voluntary certification enables additional health claims, thus expanding the information in the label and user leaflet. Voluntary certification is the evidence base for the specific characteristics of the products with regard to their efficacy represented by an independent party. This process allows the manufacturer to inform the consumer about the beneficial properties and efficacy of food supplements and enables the buyer to make an informed choice and to avoid buying counterfeit products by purchasing high-quality safe products with proven efficacy; therefore, the buyer can receive a product that is the best match for his needs and expectations. However, since the mid-2000s, several voluntary certification systems have been developed, approved, and included in the Unified Register of Voluntary Certification Systems maintained by the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology, Rosstandart. Thus, manufacturers can choose an authority. In addition to the conventional approach to certification requirements and schemes, various outcomes of approved claims and subsequent certification maintenance are possible. The present article analyzes universal principles of voluntary certification, its legal basis, and authority-specific outcomes of the process.
| Reference Key |
lozda2020regulatorytherapeutic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lozda, Raimond; |
| Journal | therapeutic innovation & regulatory science |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s43441-019-00043-z
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.