Distributed learning on 20 000+ lung cancer patients - The Personal Health Train.

Clicks: 393
ID: 89976
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #1 of 8 articles by views in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Access to healthcare data is indispensable for scientific progress and innovation. Sharing healthcare data is time-consuming and notoriously difficult due to privacy and regulatory concerns. The Personal Health Train (PHT) provides a privacy-by-design infrastructure connecting FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data sources and allows distributed data analysis and machine learning. Patient data never leaves a healthcare institute.Lung cancer patient-specific databases (tumor staging and post-treatment survival information) of oncology departments were translated according to a FAIR data model and stored locally in a graph database. Software was installed locally to enable deployment of distributed machine learning algorithms via a central server. Algorithms (MATLAB, code and documentation publicly available) are patient privacy-preserving as only summary statistics and regression coefficients are exchanged with the central server. A logistic regression model to predict post-treatment two-year survival was trained and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), root mean square prediction error (RMSE) and calibration plots.In 4 months, we connected databases with 23 203 patient cases across 8 healthcare institutes in 5 countries (Amsterdam, Cardiff, Maastricht, Manchester, Nijmegen, Rome, Rotterdam, Shanghai) using the PHT. Summary statistics were computed across databases. A distributed logistic regression model predicting post-treatment two-year survival was trained on 14 810 patients treated between 1978 and 2011 and validated on 8 393 patients treated between 2012 and 2015.The PHT infrastructure demonstrably overcomes patient privacy barriers to healthcare data sharing and enables fast data analyses across multiple institutes from different countries with different regulatory regimens. This infrastructure promotes global evidence-based medicine while prioritizing patient privacy.
Reference Key
deist2020distributedradiotherapy Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Deist, Timo M;Dankers, Frank J W M;Ojha, Priyanka;Scott Marshall, M;Janssen, Tomas;Faivre-Finn, Corinne;Masciocchi, Carlotta;Valentini, Vincenzo;Wang, Jiazhou;Chen, Jiayan;Zhang, Zhen;Spezi, Emiliano;Button, Mick;Jan Nuyttens, Joost;Vernhout, René;van Soest, Johan;Jochems, Arthur;Monshouwer, René;Bussink, Johan;Price, Gareth;Lambin, Philippe;Dekker, Andre;
Journal Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Year 2020
DOI
S0167-8140(19)33489-9
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.