Forward-peaked scattering of polarized light: erratum.
Clicks: 338
ID: 89951
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
76.2
/100
338 views
222 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #9 of 64 articles by views in optics letters
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We intend to correct the typographical errors that occurred in our recent Letter [Opt. Lett.39, 6422 (2014)].
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (15 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
clark2015forwardpeakedoptics
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Clark, Julia P;Kim, Arnold D; |
| Journal | optics letters |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1364/OL.40.002020
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.