Passage survival of European and American eels at Francis and propeller turbines.

Clicks: 297
ID: 89727
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #19 of 63 articles by views in Journal of fish biology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
We present the magnitude of losses of European eel Anguilla anguilla and American eel A. rostrata in passage through propeller and Francis turbines at hydroelectric projects. Survival and injury rates and types were turbine type related. Overall, eel survival was higher (mean ± 90% CI = 95.1 ± 5.3%,) and injury rate lower (12.5 ± 10.5) at Francis than propeller turbines (survival = 80.7 ± 6.4%; injury rate = 25.7 ± 7.9%). The common injury type at Francis turbines was bruises and at propeller turbines was severance. Blade shape and thickness of the leading edge of the blades (rounded, thick buckets of Francis turbines v. flatter, sharper edged blades in propeller turbines); eel entry routes into the turbines; their flexible, cylindrical body shape and orientation probably contributed to these differences. Relationship between survival and injury and turbine characteristics was turbine specific. For Francis turbines, one negative correlation (r = -0.986, P < 0.01) between survival and runner speed was found and two positive correlations between injury rates and fish length (r = 0.740, P < 0.10) and number of blades (r = 0.835, P < 0.05) were noted for propeller turbines. Several severely injured eels remained active 48 h after turbine passage suggesting caution is warranted when using telemetric movement for estimating eel survival. We conclude there is a need to (a) better understand travel paths and approach orientation of eels through turbines; (b) determine where only eel passage is of concern at hydropower plants that have both turbine types and therefore preferential operation of Francis turbines may be considered; (c) inform hydropower plant operators where turbine replacement is being considered and downstream eel passage is of concern that replacement by Francis or bulb turbines may prove beneficial for eel passage.
Reference Key
heisey2019passagejournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Heisey, Paul G;Mathur, Dilip;Phipps, Joanne L;Avalos, Jerry Christopher;Hoffman, Cory E;Adams, Steven W;De-Oliveira, Eric;
Journal Journal of fish biology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1111/jfb.14115
URL
Keywords
injury hi-z tag kaplan downstream emigration hydropower

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.