Non-approximated Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction integral: advantages and disadvantages in the propagation of complex wave fields.
Clicks: 260
ID: 89384
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
6.6
/100
22 views
22 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Advantages and disadvantages of the non-approximated numerical implementation of the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction integral (RSD) are revisited. In this work, it is shown that as trade-off for its large computation load, the non-approximated RSD removes any limitation on the propagation range and does not introduce any artifact in the computed wave field. A non-approximated GPU implementation of the RSD is contrasted with the angular spectrum, the Fresnel transform, and a fast Fourier transform implementation of the RSD. The forecasted phase shift introduced in the propagated wave fields as light is diffracted on complementary apertures and utilized as a metric to quantify the performance of the tested methods. An application to numerical reconstructions with arbitrary shape and size of digital recorded holograms from digital lensless holographic microscopy is presented.
| Reference Key |
buitragoduque2019nonapproximatedapplied
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Buitrago-Duque, Carlos;Garcia-Sucerquia, Jorge; |
| Journal | Applied optics |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1364/AO.58.000G11
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.