Long-Term Visual Outcome in Surgical Management of Cataract Coexistent With Corneal Opacity in One-Eyed Patients.
Clicks: 397
ID: 88949
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
397 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1 of 5 articles by views in asia-pacific journal of ophthalmology (philadelphia, pa)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To determine the visual outcome and safety of cataract surgery alone and compare with the long-term visual outcome of triple procedure in one-eyed patients.Retrospective study.This study reviewed 44 one-eyed patients with cataract coexistent with corneal opacity. The patients who underwent cataract surgery alone (group A, n = 25) were compared with patients managed by triple procedure (group B, n = 19). Outcome measures were the improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and period of maintained ambulatory vision. Institutional ethics committee approval was obtained.The most common etiology of corneal opacity was fungal and the commonest cause of permanent visual loss in other eye was phthisis bulbi. Mean age was 61.2 ± 8.1 years and 62.5 ± 6.9 years in groups A and B, respectively. At each follow-up, the mean postoperative BCVA was found significantly better than the preoperative vision in both groups and at the end of 3 years, mean postoperative vision of group A was better than that of group B (P = 0.012). Group A had longer (33.36 ± 11.97 months) mean period of maintained ambulatory vision than that of group B (26.5 ± 13.5 months) (P = 0.245) and showed less risk of losing ambulatory vision. Limited visual outcome was due to continuing presence of corneal opacity in group A, and graft infection and graft rejection in group B.Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation alone can be considered as an alternative or temporary option to provide stable ambulatory vision in one-eyed patients.
| Reference Key |
kusumesh2020longtermasiapacific
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kusumesh, Rakhi;Ambastha, Anita;Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan;Bhasker, Gyan;Mohan, Nilesh;Kumar, Shishir; |
| Journal | asia-pacific journal of ophthalmology (philadelphia, pa) |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1097/01.APO.0000617948.13052.a1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.