Investigating heartbeat-related in-plane motion and stress levels induced at the aortic root.
Clicks: 280
ID: 88853
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
280 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 15 articles by views in biomedical engineering online
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The axial motion of aortic root (AR) due to ventricular traction was previously suggested to contribute to ascending aorta (AA) dissection by increasing its longitudinal stress, but AR in-plane motion effects on stresses have never been studied. The objective is to investigate the contribution of AR in-plane motion to AA stress levels.The AR in-plane motion was assessed on magnetic resonance imagining data from 25 healthy volunteers as the movement of the AA section centroid. The measured movement was prescribed to the proximal AA end of an aortic finite element model to investigate its influences on aortic stresses. The finite element model was developed from a patient-specific geometry using LS-DYNA solver and validated against the aortic distensibility. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach was also used to simulate blood hydrodynamic effects on aortic dilation and stresses.The AR in-plane motion was 5.5 ± 1.7 mm with the components of 3.1 ± 1.5 mm along the direction of proximal descending aorta (PDA) to AA centroid and 3.0 ± 1.3 mm perpendicularly under the PDA reference system. The AR axial motion elevated the longitudinal stress of proximal AA by 40% while the corresponding increase due to in-plane motion was always below 5%. The stresses at proximal AA resulted approximately 7% less in FSI simulation with blood flow.The AR in-plane motion was comparable with the magnitude of axial motion. Neither axial nor in-plane motion could directly lead to AA dissection. It is necessary to consider the heterogeneous pressures related to blood hydrodynamics when studying aortic wall stress levels.
| Reference Key |
wei2019investigatingbiomedical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Wei, Wei;Evin, Morgane;Rapacchi, Stanislas;Kober, Frank;Bernard, Monique;Jacquier, Alexis;Kahn, Cyril J F;Behr, Michel; |
| Journal | biomedical engineering online |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1186/s12938-019-0632-7
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.