Le Projet CopuLex
Clicks: 235
ID: 88764
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
235 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 3 articles by views in digital studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The dictionary, a reference work, has a conventional structure which makes it an information retrieval instrument. It functions at two levels: that of headwords, generally ordered from A to Z (macrostructure); and that of entries or articles, giving a set of linguistic information for each headword (microstructure). A dictionary's consultability is measured in terms of the rapidity with which the user is able to find the correct headword in the macrostructure and then the required information in the microstructure. In a modern dictionary the consultability of the microstructure is assisted by a recurrent structure in which, in principle, each headword is always followed by the same types of information, given in the same order and in the same typeface; in which the most frequent pieces of information (";masculine noun";, ";transitive verb";, ";from the Latin";, etc.) are presented in the form of conventional abbreviations (";m.";, ";tr.";, ";Lat.";). Older dictionaries had a less rigorous microstructure and a less predictable content. The aim of the Copulex Project is to analyze in French lexicography the history and evolution (progressive codification) of the systems of copulas giving access to the microstructure by connecting the headword to the different pieces of information (orthography, pronunciation, grammatical category, meaning, use, etymology, etc.) This paper deals with the question of the user's linguistic and dictionary competence, which has to make up for the deficiencies or the implicitness of the system offered by the lexicographer, and examines two specific cases, one from an early dictionary (Trévoux 1743), the other from a modern one (Lexis 1975).
| Reference Key |
wooldridge1996ledigital
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Wooldridge, T Russon;Ikse-Vitols, Astra;Nadasdi, Terry; |
| Journal | digital studies |
| Year | 1996 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.