Different approaches of clients and consultants to contractors’ qualification and selection

Clicks: 159
ID: 87918
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #15 of 18 articles by views in journal of civil engineering and management

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Nowadays, clients are the dominant groups in almost all types of industries. However, the construction industry is unique and consultants, as representatives of clients, are very important figures in this industry as well. By presenting survey findings of 91 clients and 50 consultants, this study reveals clients’ and consultants’ differing expectations of contracting organisations during contractor qualification and selection. The study has clearly confirmed the fact that consultants’ perspectives are rather different and their contractors’ expectations of their clients vary very significantly from the clients themselves. Furthermore, significantly different results were found even among different types of consultants and different categories of clients. Moreover, this study showed that both clients and consultants had high willingness to continue working with the same contractor in possible future works assuming they are satisfied with the previous works. The criteria, which contribute to achieving full client and/or consultant satisfaction and hence lead to possible repetitive works are identified and the results showed the existence of significant difference between clients and consultants perspectives regarding this issue as well. The framework presented within this paper aims to help the contracting organisations to compare and recognise the different approaches and perceptions of both clients and consultants during contractor qualification and selection processes. The contracting organisations in the related sectors will be able to use the framework provided within this study to recognise the overall demand in a more complete and better manner and hence formulate or modify strategies accordingly. Skirtingas klientų ir konsultantų požiÅ«ris į rangovo kvalifikacijÄ… ir atrankÄ… Santrauka Å iandien užsakovai tampa svarbiausia grupe beveik visose pramonÄ—s Å¡akose. Tačiau statybos pramonÄ— unikali tuo, kad joje svarbiu asmeniu laikomas dar ir konsultantas, kuris samdomas kaip užsakovo atstovas. Pateikti 91 kliento ir 50 užsakovų apklausos rezultatai, kurie parodÄ—, kaip skiriasi klientų ir užsakovų lÅ«kesčiai dÄ—l rangovų kvalifikacijos ir atrankos. Tyrimas parodÄ—, kad konsultantų reikalavimai rangovams labai skiriasi nuo užsakovo reikalavimų, be to, skirtingi konsultantai ir užsakovai kelia skirtingus reikalavimus rangovams. Tyrimas parodÄ—, kad užsakovai ir klientai yra linkÄ™ tÄ™sti bendradarbiavimÄ… su tuo pačiu rangovu tvirtindami, kad yra patenkinti jo ankstesniu darbu. Nustatyti kriterijai, kurių atitikimas lemia užsakovo ir(arba) konsultanto pasirinkimÄ… ir galimybÄ™ ateityje laimÄ—ti konkursus. Pateikta sistema leidžia konkursuose dalyvaujančioms įmonÄ—ms suvokti ir palyginti užsakovų ir konsultantų reikalavimus rangovo atrankos metu. Konkursuose dalyvaujančios įmonÄ—s gali naudoti tyrimo rezultatus tam, kad suvoktų užsakovo poreikius, atitinkamai suformuluotų ir pritaikytų savo strategijas. ReikÅ¡miniai žodžiai: rangovo kvalifikacija, rangovo atranka, užsakovo lÅ«kesčiai, konsultanto lÅ«kesčiai, užsakovo poreikių patenkinimas, pasikartojantys darbai First Published Online: 14 Oct 2010
Reference Key
egemen2005differentjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Egemen, Mehmedali;Mohamed, Abdulrezak N.;
Journal journal of civil engineering and management
Year 2005
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.