Synergistic effects of quenching agents and pH on the stability of regulated and unregulated disinfection by-products for drinking water quality monitoring.
Clicks: 384
ID: 87384
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
77.2
/100
384 views
260 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #20 of 221 articles by views in Environmental monitoring and assessment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 221 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Quenching agents (QAs) are widely used in order to prevent the additional formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) during the sample holding time. In addition, DBP levels are usually stabilized by adjusting the pH of water samples. Previous studies have mostly focused on the individual effects of QAs or of pH on the stability of DBPs in water samples. Considering that disinfectant quenching and pH adjustments are applied simultaneously during routine analyses, it is more appropriate to evaluate the stability of DBPs with all the chemicals (e.g., disinfectants, QAs, buffers) present in the water. This study investigated the synergistic effects of different QAs (ascorbic acid, ammonium chloride, or no quenching) and pH adjustment (3-9) strategies on the stability of different classes of DBPs (i.e., trihalomethanes (THMs), halogenated acetaldehydes (HALs), haloacetonitriles (HANs), haloketones (HKs), and halonitromethane (HNM)). Sample preservation conditions that did not include a QA were shown to be inadequate for GC-ECD analysis, due to interference problems. Ammonium chloride was found to be effective for most DBPs. However, some HALs continued to form in the presence of chloramine, which is a by-product of dechlorination using ammonium chloride. Conversely, using ascorbic acid efficiently inactivated residual chlorine, providing a clean chromatographic baseline. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of ascorbic acid for quenching and sulfuric acid for acidifying (pH 3.5) samples. Considering the instability of some DBPs in water matrices over long periods (i.e., 14 days), samples should be processed as soon as possible after collection.
| Reference Key |
gao2020synergisticenvironmental
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gao, Jianan;Proulx, Francois;Rodriguez, Manuel J; |
| Journal | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s10661-020-8112-x
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.