Nitrate contamination of groundwater in the Lower Volta River Basin of Ghana: Sources and related human health risks.

Clicks: 363
ID: 86943
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #23 of 159 articles by views in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 159 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A significant population within the Lower Volta River Basin of Ghana relies solely on untreated groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) for various purposes. However, negative practices associated with increasing human activities pose threats to particularly GW quality in the basin. Using NO as a proxy, this study mainly focused on the status of GW contamination, origins of NO and potential human health risks through integrated hydrochemistry, correlation analysis, isotopes (N, δO), Bayesian and USEPA human health risk models. Slightly acidic to alkaline GW and SW environments were observed. Electrical conductivity (EC) values above 1000 μS/cm were recorded in 45% of the GW with a maximum of 19370 μS/cm. NO in GW ranged from 0.12 to 733 mg/L with average 59.6 mg/L and positively correlated with K, Ca, Mg Cl, Na and EC. In SW, a maximum of 5.3 mg/L of NO was observed. Largely, 75% of the GW exceeded local background NO value of 2.1 mg/L, while 35% were above the WHO recommended value of 50 mg/L. Bivariate and correlation relationships elucidated human contributions to sources of NO, Cl, SO and K to GW in the basin. From NO/Cl ratio, 43% of the GW and 21% of SW were affected by effluents and agrochemicals. Values for δN-NO and δO-NO ranged from +4.2‰ to +27.5‰ and +4.5‰ to +19.9‰ for GW, and from +3.8‰ to +14.0‰ and +10.7‰ to +25.2‰ for SW. Manure, septic effluents and mineralized fertilizers are sources of NO contamination of water in the basin. The Bayesian model apportioned 80% of GW NO contamination to sewage/manure. Hazard index indicated 70%, 50% and 48% medium to high-risk levels for infants, children and adults respectively, with 79% high-risk of SW NO contamination to infants. Immediate measures for GW and SW quality protection are recommended.
Reference Key
egbi2020nitrateecotoxicology Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Egbi, Courage D;Anornu, Geophrey K;Ganyaglo, Samuel Y;Appiah-Adjei, Emmanuel K;Li, Si-Liang;Dampare, Samuel B;
Journal Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
Year 2020
DOI
S0147-6513(20)30066-X
URL
Keywords
health risk assessment bayesian model groundwater hydrochemistry management options nitrate contamination

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.