Voriconazole plus terbinafine combination antifungal therapy for invasive Lomentospora prolificans infections: analysis of 41 patients from the FungiScope® registry 2008-2019.
Clicks: 381
ID: 86192
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
70.5
/100
381 views
254 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #10 of 22 articles by views in clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the european society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Lomentospora prolificans is an emerging cause of serious invasive fungal infections. Optimal treatment of these infections is unknown, although voriconazole-containing treatment regimens are considered the treatment of choice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of combination antifungal therapy for L. prolificans infections.We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with invasive L. prolificans infection diagnosed between 01/01/2008 - 09/09/2019 and that were documented in the FungiScope® registry of rare invasive fungal infections. We compared clinical outcomes between antifungal treatment strategies.Over the study period, 41 patients with invasive L. prolificans infection from eight different countries were documented in the FungiScope® registry. Overall, 17/40 (43%) had treatment response/stable disease and 21/40 (53%) fatal outcome attributed to invasive fungal infection. Combination antifungal therapy was associated with increased 28-day survival (15/24 survived versus 4/16 receiving monotherapy; p=0.027) and the combination voriconazole plus terbinafine trended to be associated with higher rates of treatment success (10/16, 63%, 95%CI 35-85%) compared to other antifungal treatment regimens (7/24, 29%, 95%CI 13-51%, p=0.053). In Kaplan Meier survival analysis there was a higher survival probability in patients receiving voriconazole/terbinafine combination compared to other antifungal regimens (median survival 150 days versus 17 days).While overall mortality was high, combination antifungal treatment, and in particular combination therapy with voriconazole plus terbinafine may be associated with improved treatment outcomes compared to other antifungal regimens for the treatment of invasive L. prolificans infections.
| Reference Key |
jenks2020voriconazoleclinical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jenks, Jeffrey D;Seidel, Danila;Cornely, Oliver A;Chen, Sharon;van Hal, Sebastiaan;Kauffman, Carol;Miceli, Marisa H;Heinemann, Melina;Christner, Martin;Sáenz, Alfredo Jover;Burchardt, Alexander;Kemmerling, Björn;Herbrecht, Raoul;Steinmann, Joerg;Shoham, Shmuel;Gräber, Sandra;Pagano, Livio;Deeren, Dries;Aslam, Saima;Taplitz, Randy;Revankar, Sanjay G;Baddley, John;Mehta, Sanjay R;Reed, Sharon;Slavin, Monica A;Hoenigl, Martin; |
| Journal | clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the european society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S1198-743X(20)30037-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.