Prudence vs. Credibility. A Formal Comparative Analysis between Romanian Accounting Regulations and IFRS
Clicks: 315
ID: 84964
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
315 views
67 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Starting from the controversial influence that prudence
may have on the credibility of accounting information
and from the fact that there are different views of the
global accounting systems on this concept, the present
research aims to analyze the level of formal
convergence between the Romanian accounting
regulations and the International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) on the application of prudence. In this
regard, the requirements for provisions, property, plant
and equipment, inventories and receivables were
considered, with a focus on asset depreciation and
impairment losses, elements that were considered in this
case as being representative for prudence in accounting.
Using the Jaccard coefficients, the paper compares the
requirements of the Romanian accounting regulations,
represented by OMFP no. 1802/2014 with the ones
presented in IAS 16 „Property, plant and equipment”,
IAS 36 „Impairment of Assets”, IAS 38 „Intangible
Assets”, IAS 37 „Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets”, IAS 32 „Financial Instruments:
presentation” and IFRS 9 „Financial Instruments”. The
results show that the highest degree of convergence is
identified for the provisions, and the lowest for financial
assets. Also, the requirements on depreciation and
impairment losses presented in OMFP no. 1802/2014
differ significantly from those presented in IFRSs.
| Reference Key |
nolastname2019prudenceaudit
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | audit financiar |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.