Development of an objective, standardised tool for surgical assessment of deceased donor kidneys: The Cambridge Kidney Assessment Tool.

Clicks: 294
ID: 84567
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 9 articles by views in clinical transplantation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Quality assessment in kidney transplantation involves inspection to identify negative markers of organ-quality. However, there is a paucity of evidence guiding surgical appraisal, and currently there is no evidence to differentiate important features from those that can be safely ignored. We propose a method to standardise surgical assessment and derived a simple rule to rapidly identify kidneys suitable for transplantation. Donor and recipient data were recorded alongside clinical outcomes in a prospectively maintained database. We developed a proforma (Cambridge Kidney Assessment Tool, CKAT) and used it to assess deceased-donor kidney transplants. Factors predictive of utilisation were identified by multivariate and univariate logistic regression analysis of CKAT-assessment scores, and test performance was evaluated using standard 2x2 contingency tables. 97 kidneys were included at a single centre (2013-2014), 184 CKAT-assessments were performed. A CKAT-threshold of 'Carrell+Perfusion>3', was highly specific (99%) and performed favourably to consultant opinion (specificity 95%). 96% of the kidneys implanted in accordance with the rule survived to 1-year (mean eGFR 45.3ml/min/1.73m ). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to objectively define macroscopic features that are relevant to kidney utilisation. Common language could support training in organ assessment and ultimately help address unnecessary discard of donor kidneys.
Reference Key
ayorinde2020developmentclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ayorinde, John Oo;Hamed, Mazin;Goh, Mingzheng Aaron;Summers, Dominic M;Dare, Anna;Chen, Yining;Saeb-Parsy, Kourosh;
Journal clinical transplantation
Year 2020
DOI
10.1111/ctr.13782
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.